The Cost of Exclusion
How Global Governance is Failing Young Countries
You might already know that in boardrooms across Washington, Geneva, and New York, decisions shaping the world economy are made by institutions designed for a population that no longer exists.
Today, half the global population is under 30, with the vast majority living in Asia and Africa. By 2100, a staggering 80% of the world's young people will call these continents home. Yet the financial institutions governing our global economy—the IMF, World Bank, and WTO—remain trapped in post-WWII power structures that silence the very nations poised to define our economic future.
This is a critical failure with real-world consequences for billions. When Nigeria's innovative digital economy struggles for investment, when India's massive workforce seeks opportunities, when Brazil pioneers climate solutions—their voices should shape global financial policies. Instead, outdated governance models designed for a different century continue to marginalize tomorrow's economic powerhouses.
Unfortunately, most international finance institutions continue to operate under outdated frameworks that exclude future powerhouses from meaningful decision-making. It doesn’t have to be this way.
The Legacy of Bretton Woods: Financial Governance Frozen in Time
The architecture of our global financial system was established at the Bretton Woods Conference in 1944, when 44 Allied nations created the IMF and World Bank to stabilize the post-war economy. The WTO later evolved from the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, completing the triad of institutions that would govern international finance, development, and trade.
These institutions' governance models reflect their origins: voting rights are determined largely by financial contributions, granting disproportionate power to established Western economies. Despite decolonization, the rise of emerging markets, and dramatic shifts in global demographics, the power balance within these institutions has changed only incrementally. The result is a governance structure increasingly disconnected from today’s economic reality – especially as countries with the youngest populations push for meaningful representation.
The difficulty with reforming such large systems is that they seem overwhelming, especially without a clear roadmap. However, countries like Nigeria, India and Brazil provide some blueprints on how we can create a more inclusive global economy that prioritizes a common good.
Young Nations Charting New Paths
Nigeria: Africa’s Powerhouse, Rewriting the Rules
With over 200 million people, Nigeria isn’t just Africa’s most populous country, it’s a youthful, creative, and entrepreneurial giant. But here’s the catch: even though Nigeria is one of Africa’s largest economies and contributes significantly to global growth, it holds just 0.52% of the voting power at the IMF. That’s less than many much smaller countries.
But instead of waiting for a seat at a table that wasn’t built for them, Nigeria is helping build a new one. It’s been a key driving force behind the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) – a bold plan to unite 1.3 billion people into the world’s largest free trade zone. This regional integration strategy bypasses traditional power structures while building economic resilience. Recently, Nigeria has also been pushing for reforms of the global financial architecture by seeking debt forgiveness for developing countries
Nigeria is also calling for fairer global rules, from debt forgiveness to rethinking how development is financed. And they’re investing big at home too: the government recently committed $2 billion to digital infrastructure, showing how innovation and youth-driven progress can thrive, even without global support.
India: Digital Innovation Challenging Global Financial Paradigms
India, now the most populous country in the world, has gone from being a major aid recipient to a global economic force. But despite its size and influence, India still holds only 2.75% of the vote at the IMF – far less than its economic and demographic weight would suggest.
That hasn’t stopped India from using its influence. As a member of the G20 and BRICS, India is pushing for reforms in how global finance works – leveraging its growing economic influence to advocate for a more fair playing field for countries in the Global South, including a reassessment of IMF quotas and World Bank voting structure.
But India’s biggest asset remains its digital innovation. Programs like Jan Dhan Yojana have helped millions of people open bank accounts, access insurance, and join the financial system – many for the first time. Meanwhile, the Smart Cities Mission is transforming over 100 cities with better transport, energy systems, and urban design, all powered by tech. These innovative programs demonstrate India’s capacity to shape global economic policies.
India is proving that young, fast-growing economies don’t have to follow old paths. They can lead with tech, inclusion, and big ideas that inspire the rest of the world.
Brazil: Building Alternatives to Traditional Financial Institutions
Brazil, Latin America’s largest economy, has long understood that the current global financial system doesn’t serve everyone equally. So instead of waiting around, Brazil teamed up with other rising economies to create something new.
Through BRICS, Brazil helped establish the New Development Bank (NDB) – a powerful alternative to the World Bank. The NDB has already approved over $30 billion in infrastructure projects, and unlike traditional banks, it gives all founding members equal voting power – no matter how big their economy – a direct contrast to Bretton Woods institutions.
Brazil also supports South-South cooperation and regional trade partnerships, showing that real economic progress can come from collaboration between developing countries, not just aid from developed economies.
In a world where traditional institutions are slow to change, Brazil is showing what happens when young countries lead instead of wait: they build financial systems that reflect their priorities, values, and potential.
The Cost of Inaction: Why Financial Governance Must Evolve Now
The exclusion of young nations from meaningful financial decision-making isn't just unfair – it's economically unsound. By 2035, emerging markets will contribute over 65% of global economic growth, yet their voice in shaping financial rules remains minimal. This disconnect threatens the effectiveness and legitimacy of the entire global financial system. As Africa and Asia drive global economic growth, their place in decision-making must be recognized. For global financial governance to remain relevant, it must evolve to reflect both current economic realities and future demographic trends.
The choice is clear: either reform global financial governance to include tomorrow's economic powers, or watch as a fragmented, less cooperative financial order emerges – one where the institutions established at Bretton Woods become relics of a bygone era.
The future of global economic stability depends on inclusive governance that reflects a future we want as well as today’s realities – not the past’s power structures.
Built with Shorthand